A Lead Bag For My DSLR?


Hotpixels small
This is a crop, please click the image for the full version

This is what my 3 year old 5D Mark II does when I take a 30 second exposure at ISO 800. These are not stars, these are hot pixels, and there are plenty of them.

The above picture is a crop, click here for the full version of this picture (and with it many more hot pixels).

Three years ago, when the camera was new, it had maybe two of them. Now I don’t even know how many there are. My guess is hundreds.


The reason for the dramatic increase in hot pixels isn’t the age of the sensor. The reason is that I have taken the camera onto at least 12 intercontinental flights, and the radiation exposure that the camera gets during those is strong enough to kill (or light up) individual pixels.

There are two main sources of radiation that the camera gets exposed to: the x-ray machine at airport security and cosmic radiation. I believe the high energy cosmic radiation is far worse than the x-rays, but I didn’t study physics, so please correct me if I’m wrong.

Auto Correction

Is this a problem for me? Not really. First of all I don’t typically shoot 30 seconds at ISO 800. Also, I processed the image in Lightroom, which has an automatic hot pixel correction built in. A hot pixel is easy to detect in a regular RAW file, as the neighboring pixels are not affected. I assume the way this algorithm works is that Lightroom simply replaces the hot pixel with one of its neighbors and that’s that.


The only reason these pixels show up in the above picture is that I shot it as a 9.9 megapixel sRAW file. sRAW is Canon’s format for smaller RAW files, and to make one, the camera basically interpolates the original RAW file down to a smaller size. The fact that it’s interpolated has an interesting side effect though: the hot pixels will get slightly blurred. The result of that is that Lightroom’s hot pixel detection will simply not see them.

And as a result of that, my high-ISO-long-exposure-sRAW-night-shots will show me an (albeit down-sampled) version of the mess that is my camera’s beaten-up sensor.

On the other hand that also means that if I shoot regular (non-interpolated) RAW format, Lightroom’s hot pixel detection will work just fine and if push comes to shove (e.g. if I have to shoot high-ISO-long-exposure-night-shots) a couple of hundred pixels will be happily replaced with their intact neighbors. A couple of hundred out of 21 million that is. That is about 0.01 percent. I think I can live with that for now.

Just keep in mind that your camera’s sensor will clearly suffer if you fly a lot. Not that you’ll typically notice.

As Bad As Film

Digital is no better than film in that respect. Remember the lead bags photographers used to put their film in so the x-ray machines didn’t expose it?

Here’s a thought: Maybe we should start putting our cameras into lead bags too.

Do you know if a film lead bag will protect the camera from x-rays and cosmic radiation? (My gut says: yes to the former, no to the latter)

Oh, and now you also know the reason, cameras get shipped from the overseas factories (shipped as in: ship, not airplane) and not flown.

Upcoming events:
» Jun 2016: Lofoten, Norway
» Sep 2016: Donegal
» Feb 2017: Lake Baikal, Siberia
» May 2017: Svalbard/Spitzbergen
» Nov 2017: Bhutan
» all events

Author: Chris Marquardt

Chris Marquardt is co-author of Absolut analog and The Film Photography Handbook. He's also known as a photographic mythbuster and the host of Tips from the Top Floor, the world's longest running photography show. Chris has taught photography all over the world and his mission is to enable anybody to become a better photographer. He is also a regular guest on the TWiT Network.

5 thoughts on “A Lead Bag For My DSLR?”

  1. Hi Chris,
    only the material plumb reduce x-rays & Co.. Fun with an leaden  bag ? 😉
    For your actual hot pixel problem, you can set C.Fn II-1 at 1  (optional C.Fn II-2 at 2).

  2. 246 hot pixels based on my count. Used the repair tool to do the counting – I just needed to do the clicking.

  3. I’ve recorded a spectacular interview with a particle physicist that will answer this question (and quite a few more). Next week’s episode is definitely something to look forward to!

  4. Why should a proper lead bag not shield from cosmic radiation? But I suspect we will hear this in your show.
    Apart from this you would face two problems with a lead bag big enough for your camera in an intercontinental flight:

    1. the weight: inconvenient for carrying and if worse comes to worst, you have excess baggage which costs nowadays often an arm and a leg.

    2. the TSA (and other security officers): If – what I assume – you carry your camera in the hand luggage, the security must search by hand and they are often very annoyed to have to do this. Especially at long lines waiting. And if you put your camera in the checked luggage, the x-rays cannot look into the suspect baggage, therefore first the radiation will be increased. If this still fails, your luggage will be opened (forcefully – if needed).

    So I think, it will be better living with the hotpixels, which you yourself deem acceptable.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *