Example photographs will be posted for this article soon, but the work of others and additions to the content of this article are absolutely welcome
The easy definition of a Nude portrait is to say it is just the same as any studio portrait, only the model is partially or fully exposed.
But that isn’t the best answer.
As with any form of the nude, the nude portrait cannot be gratuitous. In the eye of the viewer, if there is no compelling reason for the model to be nude, then why do it. The nudity must add something to the personlity of the portrait beyond the mere fact of nudity.
And here is an important distinction: whereas glamour photography seeks to create, on some level, a fictional or two-dimensional character in the nude, the portrait must give us something that represents the model as who they are. This is about as gray an area as there can be, but it’s about percentages. The model can still be “acting”, and can, to some degree be costumed in a straight nude portrait, but what is represented must be a three-dimensional personality, not a caricature. Even 60% reality and 40% character can work, depending on how you plan it.
Which brings us to the most important tip of all, one that could be easily overlooked. It is listed first in the next section.
None at this time.