Example photographs will be posted for this article soon, but the work of others and additions to the content of this article are absolutely welcome
Glamour portraits, with or without nudity, have been the stock and trade for advertising and entertainment magazines for almost three-quarters of a century. But what is, and is not, a glamour nude?
This is a three part answer.
First, “glamour” implies the type of personality one associates with celebrity. In the US, a commercial portrait studio, known as “Glamour Shots” offers the average housewife the opportunity to have a professional make-up and wardrobe assignment, then have pictures reminiscent of those the celebrities pose for taken of them. So the subject doesn’t have to be famous, as long as they “look” famous.
Second, the subject doesn’t have to be nude for a glamour portrait, but this article deals with nude glamour, specifically. 90% of all glamour photography is actually about selling the clothes the model is wearing.
Finally, the model in the portrait must be portraying a character of some sort, as opposed to a “straight portrait”. This is a picky difference, to be sure. The “character” may be a single piece of the model’s true self and, thus, not fictional. The key is that the portrayal must tell the viewer the model is there to be looked at, in the same way that any picture of a real celebrity is taken for that very purpose.
None at this time.